British Academy: The UK's National Academy for the Humanities and Social Sciences
Risk, Democratic Citizenship and Public Policy
Wednesday 6 June and Thursday 7 June 2001
The British Academy
10 Carlton House Terrace
London SW1 5AH
Purpose
To examine the issues that arise in the making of public policy decisions on questions of risk and safety, particularly over environmental standards and food safety, and to present the contribution that the social sciences and humanities can make to the understanding of those issues.
In particular, the conference will focus on the relationship between public opinion and preferences over risk issues and the making of public policy. How closely does public policy match the public's preferences on questions of risk? How closely ought public policy to match those preferences?
Background
In recent years there has been growing concern about the effectiveness and legitimacy of public decision-making about risk. Many, often inconsistent, criticisms have been advanced about the processes of decision-making involved in controlling risks. Some say that decision-making is insufficiently precautionary; others that it stifles innovation and raises the costs of production to uncompetitive levels. Some argue that standards need to be tightened; others that they need to be made more consistent. There is a recognition that the public needs to be more actively and effectively engaged in the process of setting risk standards. But there is little understanding of how best to do this. Organised science clearly has a place in setting standards of risk control, but scientific findings cannot substitute for the value judgements that need to be made. There is concern lest media scare stories distort the perception of risk, along with doubts that the standard setting process is sufficiently transparent in serving the public interest.
These concerns have been sparked by a series of high profile issues that at various times in the last twenty-five years or so have made headline news. They include: the debate about the safety of nuclear power; the policy response to acidification and global climate change; the Brent Spa episode; and, most recently, the UK governments handling of the BSE issue and the controversy over GM crops.
However, difficult or troubling cases are more widespread than this list suggests. They include important issues that have not been such high profile (hazards from carbon monoxide, OP sheep dip, radon or animal-to-human transplants). They also include questions about how to deal with emerging technologies (cloning or gene therapy).
Although these problems have been of considerable interest in the UK, concerns are far more widespread both in the EU, where the precautionary principle is incorporated into Treaty provisions, and among international organisations.
Registration
Attendance is by invitation only.
PROGRAMME
Wednesday 6 June
|
Thursday 7 June
|
The British Academy
10, Carlton House Terrace, London SW1Y 5AH
Telephone: 020 7969 5200
Fax: 020 7969 5300
Web site: http://www.britac.ac.uk
Text publication
Papers from this conference were published in 2002 as
Risk, Democratic Citizenship and Public Policy, edited by Albert Weale (British Academy Occasional Paper)